def _filter_by_days(self, days: int) -> List[KuyhaaBillingRecord]: cutoff = datetime.now() - timedelta(days=days) return [r for r in self.records if r.timestamp >= cutoff] if name == " main ": explorer = BillingExplorerKuyhaa() explorer.add_record(KuyhaaBillingRecord("Compute", 12.50, datetime(2025, 3, 1), "us-east")) explorer.add_record(KuyhaaBillingRecord("Storage", 5.20, datetime(2025, 3, 2), "eu-west")) explorer.add_record(KuyhaaBillingRecord("Compute", 8.30, datetime(2025, 3, 2), "us-east"))
def total_cost(self, days_back: Optional[int] = None) -> float: filtered = self._filter_by_days(days_back) if days_back else self.records return sum(r.amount for r in filtered) Billing Explorer Kuyhaa
def __init__(self, records: Optional[List[KuyhaaBillingRecord]] = None): self.records = records or [] It’s possible there’s a typo, or it refers
def cost_by_region(self, days_back: Optional[int] = None) -> Dict[str, float]: filtered = self._filter_by_days(days_back) if days_back else self.records result = {} for r in filtered: result[r.region] = result.get(r.region, 0) + r.amount return result It’s possible there’s a typo
To create a (like a code module, CLI tool, script, or API documentation) for a Billing Explorer related to “Kuyhaa,” I can offer two approaches: 1. If you meant: Generic Billing Explorer with a custom provider named "Kuyhaa" Here’s a Python class representing a BillingExplorer for a fictional provider Kuyhaa — robust, with cost analysis, filtering, and reporting.
I notice that "Billing Explorer Kuyhaa" doesn’t match a widely known software, framework, or billing platform. It’s possible there’s a typo, or it refers to something specific within a private system, a lesser-known tool, or a name mixing terms (e.g., AWS Billing Explorer, Google Cloud Billing, or “Kuyhaa” as a username or internal project).