The index, when you map it digitally, reveals a social network of belief. The Englishmen are numerous but functional. The Indians are fewer but more intimate.
The true genius of Kanigel’s index, however, is what it reveals about repetition . Scan the entries for , mock theta functions , modular forms . They appear, disappear, reappear. But then find notebooks (Ramanujan’s) . The subheads run: “contents of,” “Hardy and,” “lost notebook found.” That “lost notebook” sends you to a single page number. One. And yet the lost notebook (discovered in 1976 at Trinity College) is the book’s quiet emotional climax—the ghost that refuses to be buried. Index Of The Man Who Knew Infinity REPACK
Open to the final pages of any recent paperback edition (or the searchable “REPACK” of the digital text), and you’ll find a curious artifact: a ledger of obsessions. At first glance, it’s standard scholarly fare. sprawls across multiple lines, subheaded into: “childhood,” “illness,” “notebooks,” “taxicab number 1729.” Predictable. Comforting. The index, when you map it digitally, reveals
Every good index ends on a quiet note. The last entry in my edition is , referencing Hardy’s famous rating of mathematical talent on a scale from 0 to 100—where Hardy gave himself a 25, Littlewood a 30, and Ramanujan a 100. It is the perfect closing note: the void from which all numbers spring, and the man who filled it. The true genius of Kanigel’s index, however, is
![]()
Welcome to SIGLENT North America.
Please select a website to continue