Los Dos Papas May 2026

This levity is not disrespectful; it is radical. The film argues that the sacred is found in the profane. When Francis later sneaks out of the Vatican to minister to the homeless or when Benedict quietly slips away into retirement, the film celebrates the small, rebellious acts of humanity.

In the annals of cinema, few films have dared to place two men in a room, set them at ideological odds, and emerge with something as fragile and revolutionary as hope. Fernando Meirelles’ Los Dos Papas (2019) is precisely that film. On its surface, it is a buddy dramedy set in the gilded cages of the Vatican. But beneath the Latin chanting and the white cassocks lies a searing, profoundly human argument about the nature of faith, the burden of tradition, and the terrifying necessity of change. los dos papas

The film constructs a fictionalized private meeting in 2012 at Castel Gandolfo, where Bergoglio—having already attempted to resign as archbishop—is summoned by Benedict to discuss his departure. This meeting never happened in real life, but Meirelles and screenwriter Anthony McCarten use this dramatic license to stage a series of philosophical duels. The film’s most audacious scene occurs in the Sistine Chapel, beneath the gaze of Michelangelo’s The Last Judgment . Here, Bergoglio confesses his sins to the Pope. It is a stunning inversion of power: the future pope confessing to the current pope. But the scene is not about absolution; it is about revelation. This levity is not disrespectful; it is radical

Benedict represents the pre-modern Church—beautiful, silent, certain. Francis represents the postmodern Church—messy, dialogical, uncertain. When Benedict argues that the Church must resist the "dictatorship of relativism," Francis counters that the Church must stop dictating and start listening. The film does not declare a winner. Instead, it suggests that both are necessary: the structure of Ratzinger preserves the space for the compassion of Bergoglio. What makes the film so watchable, however, is its joy. After the heavy theology, there is a sequence where the two popes abandon their protocol to watch Germany beat Argentina in the 2010 World Cup. They eat pizza on the floor. They argue about offside rules. They forget, for a moment, that they are the vicars of Christ. In the annals of cinema, few films have

Hopkins’ final performance as a retired pope—living in a cloistered garden, feeding chickens, and smiling without the weight of the world—is heartbreaking. He has found peace by relinquishing power. Pryce’s final shot, walking through the Vatican halls alone, realizing he is now the one who must doubt, is equally powerful. Los Dos Papas is a rare film: a religious movie for atheists, a historical drama that invents its history, and a comedy about the end of the world. It argues that faith is not the absence of doubt, but the courage to live within it. It suggests that the future of the Church—perhaps of any institution—depends not on warriors who never change their minds, but on leaders willing to admit they might be wrong.